Sample Report
This is a preview using fictional data. Real values are blurred. Create an account to generate yours.
Not Legal Advice
This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Results are estimates based on the data you provided and general principles of Australian Family Law. You should seek independent legal advice before making any decisions regarding your settlement.
Separately.ai
Property Settlement Estimate
Emma & Ex-Husband
Generated 21 March 2026
Net Asset Pool: $583,000
Emma: 0.4% | Ex-Husband: 0.6%
This report is an estimate only and does not constitute legal advice. The calculations are based on information provided and general principles of Australian family law. Actual outcomes may vary. Seek independent legal advice before making any decisions.
Contents
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Position Comparison
- 3. Contribution Analysis
- 4. Confidence Ranges
- 5. Contribution Explanation
- 6. Schedule A — Non-Superannuation Assets
- 7. Schedule B — Superannuation
- 8. Schedule C — Combined Outcome
- 9. Waste Scenario Analysis
- 10. Income & Asset Projections
- 11. Cost of Divorce Analysis
- 12. Glossary
Settlement Analysis Report
Emma & Ex-Husband
Generated on 21 March 2026
Executive Summary
Overview of the settlement distribution and key metrics
Based on a total net pool of $583,000, the proposed division is 42.0% to Emma and 58.0% to Ex-Husband. To achieve this, $190,640 from Emma to Ex-Husband, assuming each party retains assets currently in their name.
Emma's Share
Ex-Husband's Share
Position Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of each party's financial position
Assessment of Contributions
Detailed breakdown of contribution adjustments under s 79 Family Law Act
Assessment Summary
Plain-language explanation of the primary drivers of this assessment
Overall Assessment
This assessment suggests an adjustment of -8.0% in Ex-Husband's favour.
Sensitivity range: -19.0% to 3.0%
Primary Drivers of This Assessment
Workforce participation: Client 67% (4.0 years out), Partner 100% (0.0 years out)
Client brought 43% of initial assets ($58,000 vs $78,000)
Future earning capacity: Client moderate, Partner strong (s 75(2)(b))
Income split: Client 34% ($65,000), Partner 66% ($125,000)
Homemaker responsibility: 30% Client / 70% Partner
2 additional factors considered. See detailed breakdown above for complete analysis.
Net Effect
Based on the factors above, Ex-Husband is recommended to receive a 58.0% share of the asset pool, with Emma receiving 42.0%.
Negotiation range: This base recommendation has a sensitivity range of -19.0% to 3.0%, reflecting different weighting interpretations that may be argued in court or negotiation.
Asset Pool Analysis
Detailed breakdown of assets and superannuation
Future Trajectory
Long-term income and retirement projections for both parties
Settlement Pathway Comparison
Understanding the financial impact of different approaches to resolving your settlement
Comparing Your Options
There are different ways to reach a fair settlement. Here's how they compare on cost, time, and what you'll walk away with.
Collaborative
Agreement-focused, using Separately
Negotiated
Moderate complexity, lawyer-assisted
Worst case: $221,540
Fully Litigated
Complex matters, court proceedings
Worst case: $186,560
A collaborative approach can make a real difference
By working towards agreement together, you could save $17,198–$44,890 in legal costs while still reaching a fair outcome grounded in Australian Family Law. Your recommended position ($42.0%) stays the same regardless of the path. The difference is how much goes to legal fees along the way.
Note: Costs based on typical Australian family law proceedings. Contested costs calculated as percentage of asset pool ($583,000). Time estimates are averages; actual duration varies by case complexity and cooperation level.
Glossary
- Addback
- When a court "adds back" money that was wasted or deliberately dissipated by one party, treating it as though it still exists in the asset pool for the purpose of calculating the split.
- Asset Pool
- The total value of all assets owned by both parties (including joint assets), minus all debts. This is the pool that gets divided between the parties.
- Cash Adjustment
- A lump sum payment from one party to the other to achieve the target split. Required when the current ownership of assets doesn't match the calculated fair division.
- Contribution Percentage
- The adjustment to a 50/50 baseline split based on each party's financial contributions, non-financial contributions, and future needs. A positive adjustment favours the client.
- De Facto Relationship
- A couple who live together on a genuine domestic basis but are not legally married. In Australia, de facto couples have similar property settlement rights under the Family Law Act after 2 years of cohabitation.
- Dissipation
- The wasteful or reckless spending of shared assets by one party, often after separation. Courts may "add back" dissipated funds to the asset pool.
- Equalisation Payment
- A payment from one party to the other to balance the division of assets so each party receives their calculated share. Same as Cash Adjustment.
- Family Law Act 1975
- The Commonwealth legislation governing divorce, property settlement, and parenting arrangements in Australia. Sections 79 and 75(2) are particularly relevant to property division.
- Financial Contributions
- Direct monetary contributions to the relationship, including income earned, assets brought into the relationship, inheritances, and gifts from family.
- Future Needs
- Factors the court considers under s 75(2) that may justify adjusting the split, including age, health, earning capacity, care of children, and financial resources.
- Initial Contributions
- Assets and financial resources each party brought into the relationship at its commencement.
- Net Asset Pool
- The total value of all assets minus all debts across both parties. This is the starting pool that the percentage split is applied to.
- Net Equity
- The value of an asset minus any debt secured against it. For example, a property worth $800,000 with a $500,000 mortgage has net equity of $300,000.
- Non-Financial Contributions
- Contributions to the relationship that aren't directly monetary, including homemaking, childcare, renovations, and supporting the other party's career.
- Ownership Split
- The percentage of an asset currently owned by each party. This differs from the target split. The goal is to redistribute assets so each party reaches their target equity.
- Post-Separation Contributions
- Financial or non-financial contributions made by either party after the date of separation, such as mortgage payments, caring for children, or maintaining assets.
- Preservation Age
- The minimum age at which a person can access their superannuation savings. In Australia, this ranges from 55 to 60 depending on date of birth.
- Splitting Order
- A court order that splits a superannuation interest between the parties. The funds are transferred directly between super funds without being cashed out.
- Superannuation
- Australia's compulsory retirement savings system. Super is treated as property in family law proceedings and can be split between parties via a splitting order or flagging agreement.
- Target Equity
- The dollar amount each party should receive based on the calculated percentage split. Target Equity = Net Asset Pool × Party's Percentage.
- Waste
- Expenditure by one party that was reckless, negligent, or designed to reduce the asset pool available for division. Courts assess whether to add back wasted amounts.
- Waste Scenarios
- Three possible approaches to handling wasted assets: no addback (waste is ignored), partial addback (only clearly reckless waste is added back), and full addback (all waste is returned to the pool).
- s 75(2) Factors
- Section 75(2) of the Family Law Act lists factors the court must consider when deciding what is "just and equitable", including age, health, income, care of children, and the standard of living.
- s 79
- Section 79 of the Family Law Act gives the court power to alter the property interests of parties to a marriage. It requires the court to consider contributions and s 75(2) factors.
Ready to see your own estimate?
Create an account and complete the guided assessment to receive a personalised property settlement estimate based on your actual situation.