This is a sample using fictional data.
Jordan and Riley are not real people and the figures are made up to show what the report looks like. Your own report is built entirely from the information you enter. This page shows the opening summary screen; the full report continues with contributions, the asset split, children, and next steps.
Your Report at a Glance
The big picture, your estimated split and the numbers behind it
In short: you'd keep roughly $425,140, about 58% of what you share together, and Riley would pay Jordan $45,000 to balance things out.
This is an estimate of where a court or negotiated settlement would most likely land, not a fixed figure. The band shows the realistic spread; the marker is our best single estimate.
The cash adjustment balances the non-super side; superannuation moves separately through a splitting order.
Across a twelve year marriage, the contributions of both parties are assessed as a whole rather than line by line. Riley’s higher income is balanced by Jordan’s role as primary carer and homemaker, so contributions are treated as broadly equal. The adjustment toward Jordan reflects future needs: the ongoing care of the children, a reduced earning capacity after time out of the workforce, and a lower superannuation balance. A division in the order of 54 to 62 per cent to Jordan is consistent with how a court approaches these factors, though the precise figure would depend on negotiation and the full evidence.
Generated by AI from your inputs. General information only, not legal advice.
Get your own report
Built from your real situation. About 30 minutes, $89 one-time, no subscription.